Correction and Retraction Policy
Kamane: Journal of Community Service is committed to maintaining the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. When errors or concerns are identified after an article has been published, the journal will assess the matter and determine an appropriate editorial action based on the seriousness of the issue, the available evidence, and relevant publication ethics principles.
This policy governs the handling of article corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions. These actions aim to preserve the reliability of scholarly information, provide clear information to readers, and ensure that the publication record remains traceable.
Editorial action may be considered when there are:
- Errors in writing, data, figures, tables, or other information that require correction.
- Substantial errors that may affect the interpretation or conclusions of an article.
- Suspected or established breaches of publication ethics.
- Concerns about authorship, consent, or the improper use of data.
- New information that materially affects the reliability of a published article.
Corrections may be considered for:
- Errors in author names, affiliations, or bibliographic information.
- Incorrect figures, tables, numerical values, or captions that require correction.
- Factual or technical errors that can be corrected without undermining the overall reliability of the article.
- Other errors that may mislead readers or cause misunderstanding.
When a correction is issued, the notice should identify the part that has been corrected and be linked to the original article. Changes must not be made silently when they affect the scholarly content or readers' understanding.
Grounds that may warrant consideration of retraction include:
- Evidence that the main data or findings are unreliable because of serious error or manipulation.
- Plagiarism or unauthorized use of another person's work.
- Duplicate publication that violates scholarly publishing principles.
- Fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data and findings from research or community service activities.
- Serious ethical violations, including unacceptable consent practices or improper use of data.
- Other issues that materially undermine the integrity or reliability of the article.
Such a notice informs readers that an issue is under examination. It is not a substitute for the outcome of an investigation and does not, by itself, establish that an author has committed misconduct.
Once the examination is complete, the journal will assess whether a correction, retraction, withdrawal of the Expression of Concern, or another editorial action is appropriate in light of the findings.The handling of a report may include the following steps:
The journal receives information about an error, inaccuracy, or suspected breach, together with supporting evidence where available.
The editor assesses the relevance of the report, the seriousness of the issue, and whether clarification is required.
Where necessary, the journal requests responses from authors or relevant parties and examines relevant documents and evidence.
Based on the findings, the editor determines an appropriate action and communicates relevant information to the parties concerned.
When a retraction is issued, the journal will seek to ensure that the retraction notice is clearly identifiable, identifies the affected article, and adequately explains the reasons for retraction without disclosing irrelevant confidential information.
The retracted article and its retraction notice should remain traceable to the extent permitted by the publishing system and applicable requirements. The retracted status should be clearly displayed so that readers do not mistakenly treat the article as a reliable, valid publication.The journal handles each case fairly and proportionately and provides relevant parties with an opportunity to clarify the matter where appropriate.
Kamane may review and update this policy in response to developments in publication ethics standards and good scholarly publishing practices. All editorial actions must have a clear basis and aim to protect readers, authors, and the integrity of the scholarly record.