Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process
Kamane: Journal of Community Service

Kamane: Journal of Community Service applies a rigorous peer review process to ensure the scientific quality and originality of the articles it publishes.

Double-Blind
Review System
Min. 2
Reviewers per Manuscript
2-6 Weeks
Review Time
Stages of the Review Process
1
Initial Screening
Every submitted article first undergoes an initial check by the editorial team to ensure it fits the focus and scope of the journal.
2
Double-Blind Review
Articles that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers for double-blind review (the authors and reviewers do not know each other's identities).
3
Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor decides whether the article is:
Accepted without revision Accepted with minor/major revision Rejected for publication
4
Manuscript Revision
Authors are given the opportunity to improve the manuscript based on the reviewers' comments.
5
Revision Check
Revised articles are checked again by the editor to ensure that all comments have been properly addressed.
6
Final Decision
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief after considering the review results and the quality of the manuscript.
Confidentiality and Ethics

All submitted manuscripts are confidential and may only be accessed by the editors, reviewers, and parties directly involved in the publication process. Reviewers must keep the contents of the article confidential and must not disseminate or use information from the manuscript for personal gain.

Review Time

The review process generally takes 2 to 6 weeks, depending on the number of submissions and the complexity of the study.

Our Commitment

Through this peer review system, Kamane: Journal of Community Service is committed to maintaining the quality and credibility of scholarly publications in the field of community service.